Reading Progress:

Interview: The Endgame of Lockdowns Was Always Mass Vaccination

by May 25, 2021Articles, Economic Freedom, Health Freedom, Interviews & Debates, Multimedia1 comment

(Image by KCB1805, licensed under Pixabay License)
I explain how our right to informed consent is under assault and how the authoritarian lockdown measures were always aimed at forcing a vaccine on us.

Reading Time: ( Word Count: )

0
(0)

I recently joined the superb Peter R. Quinones on his show Free Man Beyond the Wall to discuss how an authoritarian agenda has been advanced through propaganda and censorship, how the endgame of lockdown measures from the start was to force a vaccine on the population, how research into what is described as “vaccine hesitancy” in the literature is all about how to develop more effective pharmaceutical propaganda, how the false claim that SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated has harmed the health freedom movement, and how the libertarian community in general (with some exceptions like Peter) has exuded a disappointing silence when it comes to the fight for health freedom despite a virtual war being waged against our fundamental human right to informed consent.

At the start of our discussion, Peter complimented my work by saying, “I consider you to be one of the best investigative journalists I’ve ever read.” At the close, he also praised my book Obstacle to Peace: The US Role in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict by telling his viewers and listeners, “If you read that book, you’re gonna know more than 99.5% of the people in this country, including the pundits who are on TV right now talking about what’s going on like they have any idea whatsoever.”

Peter informed me that immediately after publishing this interview to YouTube, Google removed it and suspended his account for a week. Fortunately, we have alternative platforms like Odysee for getting critical information out. Be sure to watch to learn the truths that the thought-controllers do not want you to be exposed to!

Topics we discussed include:

  • How Facebook is censoring true information about COVID-19 vaccines on the grounds that if people are exposed to the truth, they might choose not to get vaccinated
  • How the authoritarian lockdown measures were originally sold to the public on the false pretext that they would be strictly temporary (“two weeks to flatten the curve”), when the truth was that the intent was to keep lockdown measures in place in furtherance of the endgame of mass vaccination
  • How the political and financial agenda being served by the authoritarian measures is illustrated by the fact that public health officials never talk about lifestyle choices that we can make as individuals to maintain good health and functional immunity but instead engage in fearmongering and deliver the message that the only thing we can do is obey their diktats until we get the vaccine
  • How one requirement for vaccines to get emergency use authorization from the FDA is that there can be no effective treatments available that are approved for use, which helps to explain why various approaches related to prevention of severe disease or treatment have been downplayed by public health authorities
  • How natural immunity is superior to the immunity conferred by COVID-19 vaccines
  • How measles also provides an example of a virus where the vaccine confers inferior immunity to that conferred by infection
  • How a 1986 law granting legal immunity to manufactures of vaccines recommended by the CDC for routine use in children and establishing the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program effective shifted the financial burden for vaccine injuries away from the pharmaceutical industry and onto the taxpaying consumers
  • How the body of scientific research on the phenomenon described as “vaccine hesitancy” is designed to be able to produce more effective propaganda to manufacture consent for public vaccine policies
  • A few reasons why social media companies like Facebook are censoring truthful information about vaccines
  • How the whole approach of mainstream medicine is geared toward selling people on pharmaceutical products as opposed to empowering people with knowledge about how to take control of their own health and avoid having to become dependent on pharmaceutical interventions
  • How bureaucrats are working to eliminate the doctor-patient relationship and insert themselves into the practice of medicine such that the role of doctors is to fulfil an administrative function on behalf of the state
  • How the libertarian community has been disgracefully silent, failing to speak out against (or, worse, defending) the system of medical tyranny that exists with respect to vaccines being forced on the population in violation of the right to informed consent
  • Why the propaganda slogan that “vaccines are safe and effective” is scientifically meaningless
  • How the false claim that SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated has caused tremendous harm to the health freedom movement
  • Announcement of my forthcoming book, The War on Informed Consent: The Persecution of Dr. Paul Thomas by the Oregon Medical Board
  • How my own family was just expelled from a bullying pediatric practice for declining to vaccinate our son strictly in compliance with the CDC’s schedule
  • How the Oregon Medical Board requested Dr. Paul Thomas, author of The Vaccine-Friendly Plan to produce peer-reviewed evidence to support his approach of respecting parents’ right to make their own informed choice about childhood vaccinations, but then when Dr. Thomas published a study in a peer-reviewed journal showing that the unvaccinated patients born into his practice had significantly less incidence of diagnoses and office visits for a broad range of health conditions, the board ignored the data and just days after the study’s publication emergently suspended his license on false pretexts

Scroll up and hit the play button to watch the full interview now!

Rate This Content:

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

Please Share!

Follow Me:

What do you think?

I encourage you to share your thoughts! Please respect the rules.

  • Rose says:

    Yes, that’s exactly what made me suspicious at the beginning, the government was never as worried about my well being as that, if my doc insisted for a vaccine okay, she knows me inside out but a politician on TV loving me that much? Hummm, smells fishy… And then the data was in about the potential lockdown damages, still, they kept pretending it would save the world. But… but… what about the economy, that used to be their specialty wasn’t it? At least they looked like they knew what they were talking about therefore:

    Could it be they’re hiding something from us? Nah, they wouldn’t do that would they? And would the manufacturers try to buy our representatives into slavery? Nah, they wouldn’t. And could mainstream media be sleeping with crooks instead of giving us complete, unbiased and honest information? Would they?

    I think I’ve been taken for a major ride here, when you get disappeared for saying the words “vaccines’ are, could or might, communism starts looking better and better and the brave new world doesn’t look that brave anymore…

    Thanks for a great interview, you didn’t comfort me at all… but it was a great listen. :)

    No no, I saw a great speech by a libertarian, Tom Woods, here: https://youtu.be/em9Xvz6uP2s?t=1163

    And how about some Fauci bashing? He he, for fun.
    https://youtu.be/O2Z_qJgNma0

    Cheers, Rose.

  • >
    Share via
    Copy link